|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
A second draft of the Law on the Information Society and Electronic Commerce designed to implement the E.Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) was issued in October 2000. A later version was made public in January of 2001. "Service providers" sending UCE must consult at least once a month either an external 'opt-out' list or one they maintain themselves. They may consult additional lists, and they must include the string "publicidad" or "publi" at the beginning of the Subject: line. This predictably unleashed a storm of protest
(see below), and the
final draft of 30 April 2001 includes provisions effectively banning
Unsolicited Commercial Email and promoting 'opt-in' for email advertising.
This version was adopted and entered into force on
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
[Commentary on Draft of 18 January 2001] In an earlier article, Saremedia's security expert Borja Marcos figures that if Articles 22 and 23 of the preliminary draft are enacted in their original form, "The users of this country will be able to enjoy like those of no other the benefits of what is euphemistically referred to as 'direct marketing'. That is, their electronic mailboxes will be stuffed full of advertising the same way as their traditional ones are." Attention is called to the naïveté of the Minister for Science and Technology who thinks that the draft law would promote Internet usage. Nothing could be further from the reality where thousands avoid participating in discussion fora for fear of receiving an unwanted 'service'. The preliminary draft may be laudable and well-intentioned, but it contains a dangerous poison. According to the text of the draft, users not wishing to receive advertisements can register on "one or more" 'opt-out' lists. It will be impossible for the user to protect his or her mailbox when there are innumerable such lists. "To maintain that this preserves the rights of the users is an atrocity." The labeling requirement would enable 'user filters'. Since these
are often brought into play only after the equivalent of a
32-page pamphlet (complete with images), has been downloaded (with all
that implies in terms of time on metered connections, messages lost
because the mailbox is full, etc.), the issue of damage to users is not
adequately addressed. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
In an article
on internetnews.com, the president of the
Association of Internet Users (AUI),
Miguel Perez Subias, stated that AUI intended to campaign for UBE to be
treated the same as the massive distribution of commercial faxes. There has
already been a meeting between representatives of AUI and the
Data Protection Agency.
AUI further intends to draft a proposal for debate in Parliament. |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Concerning Spanish legislation, there's not much. Only the LORTAD (Ley organica de regulación del tratamiento automatico de información, law about automated information processing), and the Agencia de Protección de Datos deal with it. That law states that every consumer has the right to modify or erase information from public databases, and that data gathered on a consumer for a certain purpose can't be used for another. AFAIK, this is older that the directive. This same agency has issued certain advices for keeping the privacy of internet users, including recommendations on spam; this document can be obtained from that web address, title "Recomendaciones a usuarios de Internet), date July 1997 The academic network, RedIRIS, houses the main resources on the topic. It also deals with spam problems coming from the academic network. (JJ Merelo 1999-02-13) |
||||||||
|
[ Countries | EU | Feedback | Main ] |